I Wrote Unto You With Many Tears

Chapter 1 explained why Paul stayed away from Corinth rather than paying another painful visit. Chapter 2 explains what that pain actually was — a “severe letter,” now lost, written through real tears, over a situation serious enough that Paul feared it might swallow the offender up in grief rather than restore him. Now that the church has responded with genuine discipline and apparent repentance, Paul’s whole tone shifts to urging forgiveness, before closing with one of his most triumphant declarations of what gospel ministry actually is.

A study in 2 Corinthians 2 · Arthur Baldwin · StandUp4Jesus.Org · 14 min read

Murillo's painting of the return of the prodigal son
Bartolomé Esteban Murillo, The Return of the Prodigal Son, c. 1667–1670, National Gallery of Art.

I Wrote Unto You With Many Tears

“But I determined this with myself, that I would not come again to you in heaviness. For if I make you sorry, who is he then that maketh me glad, but the same which is made sorry by me?”

2 Corinthians 2:1-2

Paul’s own gladness, by his own account, is inseparable from the Corinthians’ own condition. A visit that only produced more sorrow on both sides would leave him with nothing to be glad about, since the very people meant to gladden him would be the ones grieving.

“And I wrote this same unto you, lest, when I came, I should have sorrow from them of whom I ought to rejoice; having confidence in you all, that my joy is the joy of you all.”

2 Corinthians 2:3

“My joy is the joy of you all” states a real emotional bond running both directions between Paul and this congregation, however strained recent events have made it. The letter he sent in place of the visit was not a substitute for relationship but an attempt to protect it.

“For out of much affliction and anguish of heart I wrote unto you with many tears; not that ye should be grieved, but that ye might know the love which I have more abundantly unto you.”

2 Corinthians 2:4

“The apostle Paul found it necessary to reprove wrong, but how carefully he sought to show that he was a friend to the erring! How anxiously he explained to them the reason of his action! He made them understand that it cost him pain to give them pain. … ‘Out of much affliction and anguish of heart,’ he said, ‘I wrote unto you with many tears; not that ye should be grieved, but that ye might know the love which I have more abundantly unto you.’”

Ellen G. White · The Ministry of Healing, p. 166

This study’s own source holds this verse up as a model for how any necessary correction ought to be delivered — not detached or clinical, but genuinely costly to the one giving it. Paul’s own tears are offered here as proof that the “severe letter” behind this whole situation was never an act of anger, but of love willing to risk real pain rather than let a serious wrong go unaddressed.

Forgive Him, And Comfort Him

“But if any have caused grief, he hath not grieved me, but in part: that I may not overcharge you all. Sufficient to such a man is this punishment, which was inflicted of many.”

2 Corinthians 2:5-6

Paul is careful even in naming the injury, deflecting some of it away from himself personally and onto the whole congregation “in part,” so as not to make this sound like a private grievance. “Sufficient… this punishment” confirms that the church did, in fact, act on Paul’s earlier instruction — the discipline was carried out, and carried out by “many,” not by a single vindictive faction.

“So that contrariwise ye ought rather to forgive him, and comfort him, lest perhaps such a one should be swallowed up with overmuch sorrow.”

2 Corinthians 2:7

The very discipline Paul once demanded is now the thing he warns could go too far. “Swallowed up with overmuch sorrow” names a real danger discipline always carries — correction meant to restore a person can, left unchecked, tip into a despair that destroys them instead. Justice and mercy, in Paul’s own sequence, are not opposites but two necessary stages of the same process.

“Wherefore I beseech you that ye would confirm your love toward him. For to this end also did I write, that I might know the proof of you, whether ye be obedient in all things.”

2 Corinthians 2:8-9

Paul reveals a second purpose behind his earlier severe letter, beyond simply correcting the offense itself — a genuine test of the Corinthians’ own obedience. Their willingness to discipline when instructed, and now their willingness to forgive when instructed, together prove the same underlying trustworthiness.

“To whom ye forgive any thing, I forgive also: for if I forgave any thing, to whom I forgave it, for your sakes forgave I it in the person of Christ; Lest Satan should get an advantage of us: for we are not ignorant of his devices.”

2 Corinthians 2:10-11

Paul explicitly joins his own forgiveness to the church’s, refusing to let the offender feel forgiven by the congregation but somehow still condemned by the apostle who first called for discipline. The stakes he names for withholding forgiveness too long are strikingly high — not simply unkindness, but a genuine opening for Satan, whose “devices” Paul claims real familiarity with.

The Savour Of His Knowledge

“Furthermore, when I came to Troas to preach Christ’s gospel, and a door was opened unto me of the Lord, I had no rest in my spirit, because I found not Titus my brother: but taking my leave of them, I went from thence into Macedonia.”

2 Corinthians 2:12-13

This small autobiographical detail is easy to read past, but it is genuinely striking — Paul walks away from an open door for ministry, a door he himself calls Lord-given, because his anxiety over Titus’s whereabouts and the Corinthians’ own response had left him with “no rest in my spirit.” Even a called apostle’s peace of mind was bound up, in this moment, with ordinary human worry over a friend and a church he loved.

“Now thanks be unto God, which always causeth us to triumph in Christ, and maketh manifest the savour of his knowledge by us in every place.”

2 Corinthians 2:14

“‘Thanks be unto God, which always causeth us to triumph in Christ, and maketh manifest the savor of His knowledge by us in every place. For we are unto God a sweet savor of Christ, in them that are saved, and in them that perish: to the one we are the savor of death unto death; and to the other the savor of life unto life. And who is sufficient for these things?’”

Ellen G. White · Testimonies for the Church, vol. 6, p. 316

Paul’s image comes from a Roman military triumph, the great victory parade in which incense was burned along the route — a sweet smell to the victors marching home, but the very same smell to the captives being led to execution. This study’s own source ties the same passage to a larger vision of gospel work rippling outward far beyond what any single worker can see: every genuine effort to spread the knowledge of Christ registers, unseen, all the way to “the heavenly intelligences” themselves.

“For we are unto God a sweet savour of Christ, in them that are saved, and in them that perish: To the one we are the savour of death unto death; and to the other the savour of life unto life. And who is sufficient for these things?”

2 Corinthians 2:15-16

The very same preaching, offered identically to two different hearers, produces opposite outcomes — life to one, death to the other — and Paul is careful to note that believers remain “a sweet savour of Christ” to God either way, regardless of how any individual hearer receives the message. “Who is sufficient for these things?” is not false modesty; carrying a message with genuinely eternal stakes for its hearers is a weight no minister should ever feel entirely equal to on their own.

“For we are not as many, which corrupt the word of God: but as of sincerity, but as of God, in the sight of God speak we in Christ.”

2 Corinthians 2:17

The chapter’s closing verse answers its own preceding question, at least in part — not by claiming personal adequacy, but by naming the posture that makes ministry legitimate regardless: sincerity, and speaking “in the sight of God” rather than for any other audience’s approval. Whatever else separates Paul from the “many” corrupting God’s word for their own advantage, this is the dividing line he draws.

Author

  • meandvan scaled

    Self-taught Electronics Engineer, Computer Consultant, Software Engineer, and AI developer.  Active writer of religious and technical articles.  Musician and songwriter.

    View all posts Webmaster